These images relate to a gamma discussion over at
http://news.povray.org/povray.general/thread/%3Cweb.439a1b692d1f46002a1c213f0%40news.povray.org%3E/
Please post any comments there.
The images were rendered with different assumed gamma settings...1.0 vs.
2.0. My own computer system is set up with 2.0 gamma.
I replaced the cube in my original scene with a sphere.
The gray-band backdrop, made from equally-stepped gray values, is
"self-illuminating"....finish {ambient 1 diffuse 0}. The sphere is lit
from a single white point-light source placed far away, and has finish
{ambient 0 diffuse 1}. The sphere and light source are inside a lightgroup,
so the background is unaffected by the light.
Which image looks more realistic?
Ken
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'assumed_gamma_tests.jpg' (82 KB)
Preview of image 'assumed_gamma_tests.jpg'
|