POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : assumed_gamma 1.0/2.0 per discussion : assumed_gamma 1.0/2.0 per discussion Server Time
5 Nov 2024 00:28:16 EST (-0500)
  assumed_gamma 1.0/2.0 per discussion  
From: Kenneth
Date: 29 Dec 2005 02:30:01
Message: <web.43b38ea7db5693254a6a0d0@news.povray.org>
These images relate to a gamma discussion over at
http://news.povray.org/povray.general/thread/%3Cweb.439a1b692d1f46002a1c213f0%40news.povray.org%3E/

Please post any comments there.

The images were rendered with different assumed gamma settings...1.0 vs.
2.0.  My own computer system is set up with 2.0 gamma.

I replaced the cube in my original scene with a sphere.

The gray-band backdrop, made from equally-stepped gray values, is
"self-illuminating"....finish {ambient 1 diffuse 0}.  The sphere is lit
from a single white point-light source placed far away, and has finish
{ambient 0 diffuse 1}. The sphere and light source are inside a lightgroup,
so the background is unaffected by the light.

Which image looks more realistic?

Ken


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'assumed_gamma_tests.jpg' (82 KB)

Preview of image 'assumed_gamma_tests.jpg'
assumed_gamma_tests.jpg


 

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.